The paradox of the Ganga is nowhere more visible than in the data surrounding the Namami Gange program. Launched in 2015 with a staggering investment of ₹26,800 crore, the initiative was designed to be the definitive solution to the river’s woes. While the project has seen the commission of over 150 sewage treatment plants (STPs) across the river’s basin, the tangible impact on water quality in Varanasi remains elusive. Recent figures from the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) paint a sobering picture of a public health crisis in the making. During the 2025 Maha Kumbh, fecal coliform levels were recorded at a harrowing 11,000 MPN/100ml—a figure that dwarfs the permissible safety limits for bathing by thousands of times.
This gulf between government expenditure and environmental outcomes has drawn sharp criticism from the scientific community. Professor Mishra, a prominent local expert and long-time observer of the river’s health, suggests that the tools for a turnaround exist but are being blunted by administrative inertia. According to Mishra, the focus must shift from merely building infrastructure to ensuring the operational efficiency of sewage treatment and the enforcement of stricter discharge regulations. He argues that while the technology to reclaim the river is available, it is consistently undermined by a lack of sustained governmental accountability and the sheer scale of urban discharge that continues to bypass the existing treatment network.
The situation in Varanasi serves as a microcosm for the broader national struggle to balance deep-seated religious traditions with the non-negotiable requirements of modern environmental science. For the millions who descend upon the ghats to seek spiritual purification, the invisible threat of bacterial infection poses a silent but significant risk. Wade’s immersion serves as a bridge between these two worlds, validating the cultural importance of the river while using his platform to sound an alarm that the scientific community has been ringing for years.
Ultimately, the persistent pollution of the Ganga reflects a systemic failure to translate financial capital into ecological results. As the debate between faith-based reverence and scientific accountability intensifies, the future of the river hangs in the balance. Without a fundamental shift in how sewage is managed and how policy is executed on the ground, the Ganga risks becoming a monument to failed ambitions rather than a testament to India’s ability to protect its most vital natural and spiritual resource.
About The Author
Comment List